<nostalgic> good things came from Sun </nostalgic>
#pasquale
Am 21.04.2016 um 18:06 schrieb Mutschlechner, Andreas:
Neue Werkzeuge und Wege zur Software-Installation, direkte ZFS-Unterstützung und eine aktualisierte Software-Ausstattung zählen zu den Highlights des jetzt erhältlichen Ubuntu 16.04, das fünf Jahre Support bekommt.
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Linux-Distribution-Ubuntu-16-04-LTS-f...
ZFS! I'm using encrypted ZFS on my EEE Pc with 1GB of RAM and some day I'll try zfs send and receive over ssh for backup and updating server. http://blog.allanglesit.com/2013/09/zfs-send-and-receive/
(ZFS on windows = no) _______________________________________________ http://lists.lugbz.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lugbz-list
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 04:06:28PM +0000, Mutschlechner, Andreas wrote:
Neue Werkzeuge und Wege zur Software-Installation, direkte ZFS-Unterstützung und eine aktualisierte Software-Ausstattung zählen zu den Highlights des jetzt erhältlichen Ubuntu 16.04, das fünf Jahre Support bekommt.
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Linux-Distribution-Ubuntu-16-04-LTS-f...
ZFS! I'm using encrypted ZFS on my EEE Pc with 1GB of RAM and some day I'll try zfs send and receive over ssh for backup and updating server. http://blog.allanglesit.com/2013/09/zfs-send-and-receive/
(ZFS on windows = no)
If only ZFS hadn't such a crap licence (that was choosen for perfect Linux INcompatibility and that is the reason for witch you will never see ZFS officially in the kernel tree) I'll stick on btfs that will have all ZFS features and more with better performance...
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 06:26:08AM +0200, Oskar Perger wrote:
Im running zfsonlinux on debian, it works but i dont like the implementaition trough dkms.. Maybee i give btrfs a try.. Am 22.04.2016 00:27 schrieb "Mutschlechner, Andreas" ma@otetto.org:
And there are many other "little" problems that presumably will never be fixed:
http://www.eall.com.br/blog/?p=2481
btrfs is very promising indeed and will solve all ZFS problems, licence included.
--
Marco Ciampa
I know a joke about UDP, but you might not get it.
------------------------
GNU/Linux User #78271 FSFE fellow #364
------------------------
On 2016-04-22 07:48, Marco Ciampa wrote:
btrfs is very promising indeed and will solve all ZFS problems, licence included.
Agreed it's promising, but don't rush to install it on to your production systems for the time being, as it is not yet quite as reliable as older and more battle-hardened file systems: http://blog.fefe.de/?ts=a9f560e2
Th
On 2016-04-22 09:18, Mutschlechner, Andreas wrote:
IMHO an always BIG problem with FOSS is, one problem, many solutions and You have to take a decision and responsability.
I'd slightly tweak that sentence and state it as "one BIG problem with LIFE is, one problem, many solutions and you have to take a decision and responsibility."
I prefer the UNIX fast and furious way:
That's fine by me, whatever floats your boat. Since the word "sysadmin" was mentioned in the thread I wanted to add a word of caution here, that btrfs might not be quite ready for all uses right now. As you rightly point out, it's down to one's own decision, weighting risks and benefits.
Thomas
On 2016-04-22 07:55, Thomas Pircher wrote:
Agreed [btrfs is] promising, but don't rush to install it on to your production systems for the time being, as it is not yet quite as reliable as older and more battle-hardened file systems: http://blog.fefe.de/?ts=a9f560e2
In case people are still interested in file system wars, here is a Phoronix benchmark of EXT4 vs. F2FS vs. Btrfs on Linux 4.something. Ext4 is actually not as bad as often stated: www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux-44-47-fs
Thomas
-
Chris Mair -
Marco Ciampa -
Pasqualino Imbemba -
Thomas Pircher